How about Nissan's Bluebird? Comprehensive analysis of hot topics in the past 10 days
Recently, Nissan Bluebird has once again become a hot topic among car enthusiasts and potential car buyers. As a classic car, how does the Bluebird perform in terms of performance, configuration and cost-effectiveness? This article combines the hot topics and hot content on the entire Internet in the past 10 days to give you a structured and comprehensive analysis of the Niño Bluebird.
1. Comparison of core parameters of Nissan Bluebird
| project | parameter |
|---|---|
| Engine type | 1.6L/2.0L naturally aspirated |
| Maximum power | 93kW (1.6L)/110kW (2.0L) |
| gearbox | 5MT/CVT continuously variable transmission |
| Fuel consumption (L/100km) | 6.2 (1.6L)/6.8 (2.0L) |
| Body size (mm) | 4610×1760×1495 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2700 |
2. Hot topics of discussion on the Internet in the past 10 days
1.Cost-effectiveness controversy: Bluebird's terminal discount (up to 30,000 yuan in some areas) has triggered discussion. Some users believe that its configuration is slightly insufficient compared with domestically produced cars of the same class.
2.Design evaluation polarized: The suspended roof and fastback shape have been well received by young people, but the layout of the center console has been criticized as "outdated".
3.Intelligent configuration shortcomings: The 2023 model is still not equipped with L2 level driving assistance as standard, and the car system only supports basic functions of CarPlay.
3. User real word-of-mouth data statistics
| Evaluation dimension | Positive rating | Main points of complaint |
|---|---|---|
| spatial representation | 89% | Rear headroom is tight |
| Dynamic performance | 76% | CVT gearbox stutters at low speeds |
| fuel economy | 92% | Actual fuel consumption is 0.8L higher than indicated on the meter |
| After-sales service | 68% | Long waiting period for accessories |
4. Comparative analysis of competing products
with the same priceToyota Corolla,Honda CivicIn comparison, the advantages of Bluebird are:
1. Lower terminal selling price (about 15,000-20,000 yuan cheaper)
2. Longer wheelbase (2700mm vs Corolla 2640mm)
3. More personalized appearance design
Main disadvantages:
1. The value retention rate is lower than that of Liangtian’s competing products (the three-year value retention rate is about 55%)
2. Lack of safety configuration (all series are not equipped with knee airbags)
5. Purchase suggestions
Suitable for people: Home users with a budget of 120,000-150,000 yuan, who pay attention to space and fuel economy, and who do not have high requirements for intelligent configuration.
Tips for avoiding pitfalls:
1. Give priority to the 2.0L version, which has more sufficient power reserve.
2. It is recommended to install the original reversing image (missing in the low-end version)
3. Pay attention to check the working condition of the CVT gearbox (focus on the cold start performance)
Judging from recent market feedback, Blue Bird still maintains good competitiveness as a family car, but in the face of the impact of domestic hybrid models, its technology update speed does need to be accelerated. What do you think of this car? Feel free to share your views in the comment area.
check the details
check the details
en
